5/1/2023 0 Comments Cnn meme creator![]() The FBI will (presumably) stop with what is just. You send a tip to the FBI, and they decide for themselves, as an approved authority, on what punishment is proper for this person. If we're going to insist on punishing someone for inciting violence, that's why we have courts of law. That's not one of the founding principles of the United States. But if I could look at your posts, find out your home address and send a few thousand protestors to your house because of something you once wrote, who spend all night outside your house shouting and flashing bright lights for months, then you're no longer free to post what you want you can only post things that are socially acceptable. If someone volunteers that information, then feel free to use it in retaliation against them. While still not agreeing with the "court of public law" we've developed, the difference between this case and Kathy Griffin is that Kathy Griffin "doxxed herself" in doing the act with her public name, her face, on her own handle, with every possible indication of her identity already offered. We can't call ourselves "free" when anyone around us becomes a stazi to throw us into living hell. You can tell there's a serious fear effect that comes into play. Think about every dumb thing you've done in the last 10 years, and the fact that someone could have recorded any of them and could doxx you at any time for any reason. The creation of the "public court of law," wherein people begin leaving dead animals on porches and pizzabombing places of employment because of one bad apple in them, is one of the biggest threats to individual freedom we could have. Modern society is based on the idea that people should be allowed some leeway to do stupid things, because if everyone were immediately held responsible for everything they did wrong, the entire country should be in prison. There's a level of anonymity that protects the public from disproportionate retaliation for the stupid things we all inevitably do. Supposedly-respectable people now do doxxing. Why should anyone be surprised if Fox News decides to out some antifa supporter and broadcast their personal information to 1,500,000 followers on prime time TV? We used to be able to say, "Well, that's just for fringe people like 4chan and The_Donald," and now we can't even say that. Then the public begins to take that as a cue for morality "If CNN did it, then I guess it's okay." That's precisely how people think. When our mainstream news organizations spend their time unveiling the identities of individual criminals to 2,000,000+ able-bodied potential retaliators, that is a serious professional lapse in judgment. ![]() ![]() They are or are supposed to be mainstream. Several reasons the idea that CNN pretends to be an objective news source comes first. Doxxing anyone is immoral, but to do it to someone who can't even handle life at the level of an adult is extremely morally deficient.ģ.) 4chan and r/the_Donald use Doxxing all of the time, what is the big deal now? Their brain isn't developed to a stage where they can process stress and trauma to the level of an adult. They've gained life skills that allow them to reorganize their lives around the mass of public attention so as to start again. I wasn't around for those but I am for this one and the retaliatory environment both sides are demonstrating is extremely worrying.Ģ.) of course 4chan is posting that the user is 15, can this be verified? And what makes it matter more?īecause adults tend to have means to move themselves around, get a job, and so on. 1.) if they just identified the user who created the meme in the article would there be an issue? The same happened to other /u/'s who became infamous, it wasn't that big of a deal then, why now?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |